Joined: 30 Apr 2012
|Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:59 pm Post subject: The Rio +20 Earth Summit
|Between 20th and 22nd June 2012 the nations of the world met in Rio for a major conference on global environmental issues.
Given the importance of climate change, the fact that the vast majority of the worldâ€™s experts are convinced that global warming is real, and the staggering fact that demand for natural resources has doubled since 1996 and is now 50% higher than the planetâ€™s regenerative capacity, the summit was perhaps long overdue, the last one having taken place 20 years earlier - itself a follow-up to the 1972 Stockholm conference. The latest forecasts also project that the worldâ€™s population will soar in the next 40 years from the present 7 billion to 9 billion. Clearly, we are approaching breaking point: a point where the shortage of resources and their unequal distribution will lead not only to mass starvation but to increased tension and conflict that could easily spill over into global war.
Therefore, the aims of Rio were noble: to aim to reach a set of internationally agreed global sustainability goals by 2015 which would attempt to balance consumption and production of key resources such as water, food and energy; to reduce consumption of fossil fuels; and to help subsidise the development of more sustainable economies for poorer nations.
Unfortunately, of course, most of the power to change the global environment for the better lies with the â€˜richerâ€™ nations, who are tied up with the vested interest of capitalist corporate giants who will nearly always (unless embarrassed into doing otherwise by the consumer, or forced to by government controls) put profit before any higher principle. It has now become part of the conventional wisdom that the leaders of these monolithic corporations infiltrate and influence the central cabinets of governing powers with a stealth and ingenuity that the KGB and CIA would be proud of. Perhaps this was the major reason why the goals set 20 years earlier to tackle climate change and world poverty have had little impact, as the statistics cited in the second paragraph above illustrate.
It was almost inevitable, therefore, that most of the environmental activists would see Rio as a failure. Greenpeace claimed that it was in fact â€œa failure of epic proportionsâ€, and went on to say that "We didn't get the Future We Want in Rio, because we do not have the leaders we need. The leaders of the most powerful countries supported business as usual, shamefully putting private profit before people and the planet." Indeed, even before the summit began Greenpeace was lambasting the summit on the basis of the negotiations text, the creation of which had been lengthily drawn out, claiming scathingly that: â€œâ€œWe were promised the 'future we want' but are now being presented with a 'common vision' of a polluterâ€™s charter that will cook the planet, empty the oceans and wreck the rain forests. This is not a foundation on which to grow economies or pull people out of poverty, itâ€™s the last will and testament of a destructive twentieth century development model. The only sensible thing left on the table until today was the launch of an Oceans Rescue Plan for the High Seas. This too has now been killed by the US, Canada, Russia and Venezuela who want to mine the seas for private profit with impunity and exploit the resources that belong to all humanityâ€¦.. From the G20 to Rio+20 this is not a good week for people and the planet. While billions are being spent bailing out banks and billions more on subsidising the fossil fuel industry, its clear whose agenda our leaders are following, that of business as usual of polluting corporations.â€
Meanwhile, the World Development Movement claimed that â€œIndustrialised countries refused to commit to allocating a single additional penny to help poorer countries move towards a green economy, and the final agreement was nothing more than a reaffirmation of previous commitmentsâ€, and even claimed, perhaps over-cynically, that some of the major players in the drinks industry such as Coca Cola, Glaxo Smithkline and NestlÃ© wanted to price water in order to reduce unfair competition with their own products (although the other side of the coin is that water is being used wastefully because it is freely available).
Overall, it no doubt comes as no surprise to the cynics amongst us, myself included, that Rio 20 was more bluster than action. Unfortunately, there is no longer time for such bluster. Some experts believe that itâ€™s already too late and that the world is now spiralling uncontrollably into an environmental disaster that will only be resolved by the death by starvation of millions of people in order to reduce the demand for our planetâ€™s finite resources. Letâ€™s hope that this proves to be unduly pessimistic. Letâ€™s hope, too, that some real progress is indeed made to put in place some internationally agreed global sustainability goals by 2015, and that they are then acted upon. The eyes and minds of the world are watching and hoping. Or at least, those of the vast majority who have not been seduced by corporate backhanders.
As published in the Articles section of our website
Visit the website at www.globalfightback.org